<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Blarg &#187; nuclear power plants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theblarg.com/tag/nuclear-power-plants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theblarg.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:39:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>California Election 2008: Propostion 7</title>
		<link>http://www.theblarg.com/2008/10/26/california-election-2008-propostion-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theblarg.com/2008/10/26/california-election-2008-propostion-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 02:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nathan118</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air conditioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[la times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windmill farm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theblarg.com/?p=1131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prop 7 &#8211; RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION My Summary: From the LA TImes: &#8220;Require public and private utilities to obtain at least 20% of their electricity from renewable sources by 2010 and 50% by 2025.&#8221; My Opinion: This is probably one of the most dangerous measures on the ballot, because the unforeseen economic impact could be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<div class="entry">
<p>Prop 7 &#8211; <a href="http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/title-sum/prop7-title-sum.htm"><strong>RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION</strong></a></p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic;">My Summary:</span> From the LA TImes: &#8220;Require public and private utilities to obtain at least 20% of their electricity from renewable sources by 2010 and 50% by 2025.&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic;">My Opinion: </span>This is probably one of the most dangerous measures on the ballot, because the unforeseen economic impact could be HUGE.</p>
<p>First, renewable energy sounds nice, but it will only work when it&#8217;s economically viable. I&#8217;ve actually read about installing solar panels on your house. There&#8217;s a big upfront cost, but in the long run it can actually be a good economic decision, and there are people that do it. That&#8217;s how renewable energy should grow and succeed&#8230;through private means, not a stupid ballot measure that forces it upon energy companies when it&#8217;s not even a good economic decision.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t enjoy spending $200 during the summer when we run the air conditioner, and I sure as heck wouldn&#8217;t enjoy paying more because the stupid energy is coming from a windmill farm that is causing prices to soar. They&#8217;ve got to be joking when they say 50% by 2025, because it sure is making me laugh!</p>
<p>A good solution is building nuclear power plants, but even the proponents of this bill are trying to paint nuclear power as wrong. In their for arguments: &#8220;<span class="left-ar">We can do better than dirty coal, nuclear power, and offshore drilling.&#8221; No, we really can&#8217;t right now&#8230;because if we could, someone would be doing it.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic;">Bottom Line:</span> Renewable energy will become a greater part of our energy plan as it makes sense economically. Let the private sector figure this out, and stay the heck away government.</p>
<p>I am voting <strong>NO</strong> on Prop 7.</p>
<p>Make sure you visit <a href="http://geekyweekly.com/">Geeky Weekly</a> for his take on Prop 7.</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theblarg.com/2008/10/26/california-election-2008-propostion-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commercials that Insult My Intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.theblarg.com/2007/09/17/commercials-that-insult-my-intelligence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theblarg.com/2007/09/17/commercials-that-insult-my-intelligence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nathan118</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human decency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new nuclear power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pet peeve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theblarg.com/2007/09/17/commercials-that-insult-my-intelligence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The TMobile commercial where the kids all get out their sidekicks and decide to meet at the market was on. They proceed to have a big race in the store amidst everyone else&#8217;s normal shopping. I can&#8217;t stand this commercial. It&#8217;s annoying that they&#8217;re running around the store. I&#8217;d be pissed if I was one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The TMobile commercial where the kids all get out their sidekicks and decide to meet at the market was on. They proceed to have a big race in the store amidst everyone else&#8217;s normal shopping.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t stand this commercial. It&#8217;s annoying that they&#8217;re running around the store. I&#8217;d be pissed if I was one of the customers, or the store owner. There&#8217;s one scene where they knock over a stand of toilet paper. If it weren&#8217;t for that scene I wouldn&#8217;t mind as much. If they simply raced through the store and left it in the same condition, then it wouldn&#8217;t be so bad. But when they start screwing with the fictitious store it screws with human decency!</p>
<p>I have another pet peeve to rant about, and that&#8217;s the stupid commercials urging me to conserve energy. Don&#8217;t make me feel bad for using electricity that I&#8217;M paying for, only because the people that run this state are too stupid to build new electric plants. It&#8217;s <a href="http://www.energy.ca.gov/nuclear/california.html">against the law</a> to build new nuclear power plants, while France makes billions of Euros <em>exporting</em> extra energy.</p>
<p>One specific commercial I&#8217;ve heard claims that if every person replaced 1 regular bulb with a fluorescent, it would take thousands of cars of the road. Whoa, hold on. If my light bulb were powered by a nuclear reactor, how the flip would using less energy have anything to do with carbon emissions? Are they assuming all our power is from burning coal?</p>
<p>I wish politicians would stop screaming that energy is evil. I&#8217;m tired of their crap.</p>
<p>Edit: <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7921287/">New nuclear plants in development</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theblarg.com/2007/09/17/commercials-that-insult-my-intelligence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

