Browsing Posts tagged kerry

Post-Debate Impressions

No comments

The debate wasn’t too exciting. Kerry attacked Bush the whole time for waging the “wrong war at the wrong time,” and Bush stuck to his “stay the course” type message.

What really bugged me were all the dopey media people afterwards. Oh how I long for cable TV and Foxnews. ABC had a “quick poll” that showed about 15% more people thought Kerry won the debate, but that President Bush’s lead on Kerry held (they both received 1% more vote than pre-debate). Then of course the crazy media people went on and on how it was some big win for Kerry, but completely ignored that it didn’t change anyone’s mind. I’m not really sure why they think Kerry was the winner…because he was on the “offensive” more? So whoever criticizes the other more wins? John Kerry doesn’t have any plan for Iraq except that he would do it “better,” whatever the heck that means, and he wins?

I love talk radio and the blogosphere, and not so I can here opinions and points of view that are similar to mine, but so I can hear some sanity in the midst of such doofs.

Kerry’s Positions on Iraq

No comments

Kurtis sent me this awesome sound montage of John Kerry and all his positions on Iraq. Send this link to your friends, because everyone who is of age to vote needs to hear this. It will open their eyes.

John Kerry Takes EVERY Position

Kerry Before and Afters

No comments
 

The picture on the left is from Drudge’s website, and the picture on the right is from this Yahoo News page. It’s really hard figuring out the timeline of when the pictures were taken, but it’s quite amusing.

 

Oompa Loompa Kerry

No comments
 

In case you haven’t heard or seen…John Kerry was a little more "orange" this week than usual. People are speculating that there might be some pre-debate "prepping" going on. The Kerry camp’s explanation? He was playing football for one hour the day before. Should be interesting to see what color he is come Thursday, the first Presidential Debate. I can’t wait.

The story at Drudge.

 

This recent story about John Kerry really struck me as odd. If you read it, you’ll see that John Kerry is claiming President Bush will call up more troops after he gets elected in November. The article goes on to show several people who have no idea what he’s talking about, and one person who claims he’s heard about this. Not surprisingly that person is a Democrat, but we’ll come back to that.

I’ve found it to be a constantly recurring theme that I must decipher and critically think about everything people say this election year. If John Kerry says President Bush is fighting the “wrong” war, what does that mean? John Kerry supported the war at one point, so does he just not like the way it’s turning out? Or is he trying to separate himself from Bush? What the evening news doesn’t tell you is that Kerry has had a 100 stances on the war in Iraq. It stems all the way back to the Democratic primaries. Good ‘ol Howard Deam was completely anti-war, so to distinguish himself from Dean, Kerry was pro-war. Well, Kerry won that battle…but now he’s got a problem: Bush is pro-war…and he can’t have the exact same stance on one of the most important issues to voters. Therefore, like he did in the Democratic primaries, he’s trying to find a new stance to “market” himself. If you don’t believe me check out www.kerryoniraq.com.

Something else in that article that blows me away is when Kerry says “Doesn’t George Bush watch the evening news?!” In other words, doesn’t President Bush see the body count reported every night?. This is an important point, because I think it’s what separates Liberals from Conservatives. Liberals think primarily with their emotions, and Conservatives think primarily with their brain. A Liberal can’t look at Iraq, see a death toll, and then decide “is it worth it?” Instead they just gawk and wail that a US Soldier died. I’m not demeaning the value of life, and in fact I’d say that is what the liberals are doing. I say when a soldier dies they have served their country and worked to secure freedom in Iraq. A liberal on the other hand will say they died fighting a pointless war and it’s all President Bush’s fault. They can’t even support our troops now because that’s indirectly supporting Bush.

Ultimately I think the majority of voters will be able to decipher all the coded messages being transmitted this election year. Democrats have been hoping for Iraq to turn into Vietnam, but that’s not happening. Republicans have been wanting the economy to boom like crazy, but I’d say it’s just in a regular recovery. In the end, look at what people say and decide for yourself if it’s the truth. You’ll be smarter for it.

If you’re like most people and depend on the mainstream media for information, then you’ve probably never seen this. I didn’t even know much about Bush’s service, but this article details it well.

Bush’s National Guard Service

Instapundit brought up a great point: “Isn’t strange that the biggest difference between the Bush National Guard stories and the Kerry Vietnam controversy is that, in the President’s case, it’s the major media dogging the story to death?” I haven’t seen the mainstream media accurately report President Bush’s service, have you?

I feel enlightened.

Flip-Flop, or Just Hilarious?

No comments
 

A recent DrudgeReport headline reveals that kerry co-sponsored a ban on the very type of gun he is holding in this picture. But I’m sure the mainstream media won’t tell you that. *Shhhhh* John Kerry is a liberal, and one of the things they do is try to get rid of guns, *shhhhh*. It’s pretty funny, check it out.

Kerry and his Shotgun

 

Kerry on Iraq

No comments

Confused on what Kerry’s stance on Iraq is? Don’t worry, so is he. Watch this video and see what Kerry’s stance on Iraq is as shown in his own words.

Kerry on Iraq

Note that this is MUCH more convincing than Fahrenheit 9/11. It uses Kerry’s own words instead of using twisted voice overs.

Powered by WordPress Web Design by SRS Solutions © 2012 The Blarg Design by SRS Solutions